PDA

View Full Version : John Kerry's Economic Plan--Marry a Rich Chick...


sinecure
February 3rd, 2004, 04:07 AM
Hey... it's worked so far! :wink

From my gal, Ann at: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36827

But if Bush can't talk to Kerry about the horrors of war, then Kerry sure as hell can't talk to anyone about the plight of the middle class. Kerry's life experience consists of living off other men's money by marrying their wives and daughters.

For over 30 years, Kerry's primary occupation has been stalking lonely heiresses. Not to get back to his combat experience, but Kerry sees a room full of wealthy widows as "a target-rich environment." This is a guy whose experience dealing with tax problems is based on spending his entire adult life being supported by rich women. What does a kept man know about taxes?

In 1970, Kerry married into the family of Julia Thorne – a family estimated to be worth about $300 million. She got depressed, so he promptly left her and was soon seen catting around with Hollywood starlets, mostly while the cad was still married. (Apparently, JFK really was his mentor.) Thorne is well-bred enough to say nothing ill of her Lothario ex-husband. He is, after all, the father of her children – a fact that never seemed to constrain him.

When Kerry was about to become the latest Heinz family charity, he sought to have his marriage to Thorne annulled, despite the fact that it had produced two children. It seems his second meal ticket, Teresa Heinz, wanted the first marriage annulled – and Heinz is worth more than $700 million. Kerry claims he will stand up to powerful interests, but he can't even stand up to his wife.

Heinz made Kerry sign a prenuptial agreement, presumably aware of how careless he is with other people's property, such as other people's Vietnam War medals, which Kerry threw on the ground during a 1971 anti-war demonstration.

At pains to make Kerry sound like a normal American, his campaign has described how Kerry risked everything, mortgaging his home in Boston to help pay for his presidential campaign. Technically, Kerry took out a $6 million mortgage for "his share" of "the family's home" – which was bought with the Heinz family fortune. (Why should he spend his own money? He didn't throw away his own medals.) I'm sure the average working stiff in Massachusetts can relate to a guy who borrows $6 million against his house to pay for TV ads.

Kerry's campaign has stoutly insisted that he will pay off the mortgage himself, with no help from his rich wife. Let's see: According to tax returns released by his campaign, in 2002, Kerry's income was $144,091. But as the Washington Post recently reported, even a $5 million mortgage paid back over 30 years at favorable interest rates would cost $30,389 a month – or $364,668 a year.

The Democrats' joy at nominating Kerry is perplexing. To be sure, liberals take a peculiar, wrathful pleasure in supporting pacifist military types. And Kerry's life story is not without a certain feral aggression. But if we're going to determine fitness for office based on life experience, Kerry clearly has no experience dealing with problems of typical Americans since he is a cad and a gigolo living in the lap of other men's money.

And all along, I didn't know that about him...:question

w1che
February 3rd, 2004, 12:30 PM
Quote from Sin.. /snip I'm sure the average working stiff in Massachusetts can relate to a guy who borrows $6 million against his house to pay for TV ads.
>>>>>>>>>>>

Do you think anyone is going to keep a close eye on WHO pays that loan back? Remember he couldn't use his wifes money so he had to take out the loan. After the election do you think his wife will slip the money in there to pay that loan?

Ateo
February 3rd, 2004, 03:57 PM
What the hell? She didn't mention Clinton. :confused

sinecure
February 3rd, 2004, 06:06 PM
Originally posted by tigsnort
What the hell? She didn't mention Clinton. :confused

As you just demonstrated... it's YOU guys who keep the Clinton argument alive and breathing. :rolleyes:

Most of US would rather forget him like a bad dream, but it's the libs who keep waving him around like some sort of hokey Community Theater "Rally 'Round the Flag, Boys" production. :p :lol :lol :wave

Sjax
February 4th, 2004, 04:22 AM
But if Bush can't talk to Kerry about the horrors of war, then Kerry sure as hell can't talk to anyone about the plight of the middle class.
Can Bush talk to anyone about the plight of middle class? Can Bush talk to anyone about anything other than being carried though life, while being irresponsible in a number of ways?
I think that going personal is not the way you want to go as a Bush-supporter.

That being said, is it true that Kerry spents $120 a week on his hairdresser?

sinecure
February 4th, 2004, 05:48 AM
Originally posted by Sjax

Can Bush talk to anyone about the plight of middle class? Can Bush talk to anyone about anything other than being carried though life, while being irresponsible in a number of ways?
I think that going personal is not the way you want to go as a Bush-supporter.

That being said, is it true that Kerry spents $120 a week on his hairdresser?

Once again,you missed the point. Bush isn't the one who is claiming to understand and represent the "over-taxed working man".

I don't know if Kerry spends that much on his hair... it always DOES look really nice though. :rolleyes: :lol :lol

w1che
February 4th, 2004, 12:16 PM
The Demorats don't care about the middle class. They CARE about the working poor..Don't you know?? Of course they have been in power off & on for over 50 years & we have more WORKING poor now than we had before. Johnson, Carter, Clinton were all going to take care of the poor & old folks but that was only when they were trying to get elected because it never happen..

There are more RICH Demorats in congress than there are RICH Republicans but of course they can relate to the poor better. What they really are is better B/Sh*ters to the poor because lying just comes natural the them..

They are one disgusting lot..

aclu14
February 4th, 2004, 09:42 PM
Yes, and let's just forget that the current presidential administration is the richest ever in history.

w1che
February 5th, 2004, 12:27 AM
I don't have to forget ACLU because it's not true.. Did you dream that last night or do you have facts to support your contention?

sinecure
February 5th, 2004, 12:37 AM
Originally posted by aclu14
Yes, and let's just forget that the current presidential administration is the richest ever in history.

Also the TALLEST. [It's just about as important]

Show me where this administration is the "richest"... please compare and adjust democrat-inflated dollars with the dollars of administrations past. You might be surprised. :eek:

DustyBottoms
February 5th, 2004, 12:56 AM
Don't you just feel sorry for those poor Kennedys... :cry :cry

Sjax
February 5th, 2004, 03:00 AM
Sin: I admit that I don't know what Kerry said and what he didn't say and that I maybe should stay out of these discussions about american domestic politics. However, I think it is rather hypocrate to expect something of your opponent that your own man can't live up to himself.
This seems pretty much like a diversion maneuvre from the fact that Kerry is a war hero and Bush is a deserteur.

They said on danish television that he used $120 on his hair. I find it pretty extreme. Yes he has nice hair, but come on, how hard can it be to maintain short hair like his.

Ateo
February 5th, 2004, 04:46 AM
Originally posted by sinecure


As you just demonstrated... it's YOU guys who keep the Clinton argument alive and breathing. :rolleyes:

Most of US would rather forget him like a bad dream, but it's the libs who keep waving him around like some sort of hokey Community Theater "Rally 'Round the Flag, Boys" production. :p :lol :lol :wave No, actually I was just suprised that Coulter didn't bring him up like she does in just about every column she writes. She has a history of being obsessed with Clinton. Maybe she'll develop an obsession with Kerry's wife and be able to move on. :lol

Dumbie
February 6th, 2004, 05:30 AM
http://www.usvetdsp.com/jf_kerry.htm
Keery needed money like he needed another navel.