PDA

View Full Version : Bush vs Kerry


Idnew
April 28th, 2004, 07:41 AM
I'm surprised no one has done this and with the many liberals on this board I think I know how it will go but lets see. On polls of course you can vote anonomously without making a comment. So for those of you that just read and don't reply you can vote on this poll.

DEAD ZONE
April 28th, 2004, 08:01 AM
what about the libertarian or nader?

AWPrime
April 28th, 2004, 10:04 AM
or a cute puppy.

http://workingforchange.speedera.net/www.workingforchange.com/webgraphics/wfc/TMW4-9-03.gif

dave404
April 28th, 2004, 10:55 AM
How about Bill Hicks? I know he's dead, but I think he'd still do a better job than any of the current candidates. Representing the Goatboy Party, of course.

Serendipity
April 29th, 2004, 05:50 PM
Originally posted by dave404
How about Bill Hicks? I know he's dead, but I think he'd still do a better job than any of the current candidates. Representing the Goatboy Party, of course. He'd be a tough guy all right - surely he'd be obliged to insist his campaign manager do the world a favour and kill himself? :lol

dave404
April 29th, 2004, 06:12 PM
Yes, good point. I've been trying to imagine some of the laws he'd be proposing. Legalising all drugs is an obvious one. Forcing people who work in advertising and marketing to either resign their jobs or have I AM THE SPAWN OF SATAN tattooed across their foreheads would probably be another. Any rock artist who endorses Coca Cola, Pepsi or Taco Bell to be permanently banned from any creative endeavours.... it all sounds pretty good to me!

Idnew
April 29th, 2004, 06:13 PM
Don't give me a hard time DZ ok I'll add Nadar...........satisfied.......puppy no

aclu14
April 29th, 2004, 09:07 PM
Originally posted by dave404
How about Bill Hicks? I know he's dead, but I think he'd still do a better job than any of the current candidates. Representing the Goatboy Party, of course.

The Onion did something like this once - Living Representatives Nominate Roosevelt's Corpse for Fifth Term.

DEAD ZONE
April 29th, 2004, 09:45 PM
Originally posted by dave404
Yes, good point. I've been trying to imagine some of the laws he'd be proposing. Legalising all drugs is an obvious one. [/QUOPTE]Sounds good[QUOTE]Forcing people who work in advertising and marketing to either resign their jobs or have I AM THE SPAWN OF SATAN tattooed across their foreheads would probably be another.OK?????? Any rock artist who endorses Coca Cola, Pepsi or Taco Bell to be permanently banned from any creative endeavours.... it all sounds pretty good to me! Ok.Anti capitolist DOG!!!

DEAD ZONE
April 29th, 2004, 09:50 PM
Originally posted by Idnew
Don't give me a hard time DZ ok I'll add Nadar...........satisfied.......puppy no WHAT ABOUT THE LIBERTARIAN!!!!!!!

King Solomon
April 29th, 2004, 11:58 PM
Originally posted by DEAD ZONE
WHAT ABOUT THE LIBERTARIAN!!!!!!!

Yea, where's K-Lib, he's a Librarian :lol

Sjax
April 30th, 2004, 03:06 AM
A little compliment for you, King: I have never heard of anyone who can make so many stupid jokes so funny as you can:clap :) :clap :lol

King Solomon
April 30th, 2004, 09:10 AM
It's all in the timing and how tight you wear your underwear :wink

AWPrime
April 30th, 2004, 11:57 AM
Originally posted by Idnew
.......puppy no

No Puppy....:cry :cry :cry :cry :cry

DEAD ZONE
April 30th, 2004, 12:01 PM
Originally posted by AWPrime


No Puppy....:cry :cry :cry :cry :cry I bet they do a better job. any takers?

aclu14
April 30th, 2004, 03:53 PM
Let's do a Limbaugh and nominate Chelsea Clinton, according to him when she was 13 she was the "White House dog."

Not nice. :argue

Ateo
May 1st, 2004, 12:07 AM
Is Nadar, like, being able to tell if someone is a member of the Green party just by looking at them? :)

DEAD ZONE
May 1st, 2004, 07:29 AM
Its nor easy being green.http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/Gif/oscar2.gif
http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/Gif/kermit2.gif


http://www.stopstart.fsnet.co.uk/new/honker.gif

Serendipity
May 3rd, 2004, 01:40 PM
Dave, while Bill Hicks would be a great Prez, as Aclu hinted he has the distinct disadvantage of being dead. I suggest Lord Archer. Cruel, maybe, and the consequences would be unforeseeable. But it would get him off our hands. I know he's not American, but he could lie about that, couldn't he? :lol

dave404
May 5th, 2004, 05:12 AM
Nah, the Americans don't like their President to have sex. I nominate Noel Edmunds. As a provider of vacuous content-free "entertainment", he's second to none. He interviews better than Bush, it's impossible to imagine anyone having sex with him, and I'd enjoy seeing him assassinated, which is more likely to happen over there than it is here. Cruel enough for you yet?

ps It would be easier just to sling Archer back in jail. I rather liked him, in jail.

Idnew
May 5th, 2004, 07:36 AM
Dave and Dippy, I Have no idea who your talking about but since you think so highly of him or them.........KEEP HIM......them!!!!!!!!!:lol

Ateo
May 6th, 2004, 02:27 AM
Originally posted by dave404
Nah, the Americans don't like their President to have sex. Actually they don't mind at all, as long as it's Christian sex.

Serendipity
May 6th, 2004, 02:44 PM
Originally posted by Idnew
Dave and Dippy, I Have no idea who your talking about but since you think so highly of him or them.........KEEP HIM......them!!!!!!!!!:lol Id, we're talking 'bout 3 people. As a Texan you ought to know who Bill Hicks is. If you don't, then you ain't quite as Texan as I thunked.

Lord Archer (yep, he's a Lord) has been let out of jail recently. Briefly, years ago a newspaper claimed that he had had sex with a woman who was not his wife. He successfully sued the paper for libel. Many years later more evidence surfaced, and it emerged that he had had sex with this woman. The paper claimed its money back (half a million, plus interest). Lord Archer went to jail.

Noel Edmunds. Noel Edmunds is to light entertainment what toothache is to chocolate: the sad inevitable consequence of overdoing a good thing without looking at what damage might be being done. He gave the world Mr Blobby. In the 1980s he hosted a Saturday morning kids TV show called Swap Shop, which was the BBC's answer to ITV rival Tizwaz (the greatest kids show ever IMNSHO (but I'm biased)).

Are you sure you don't want them? I still reckon Lord Archer would be best - the sex scandals that would doubtless issue from the White House would be an embarrassment to whatever party he represents, it's true - but even that would be less embarrassing than what Bush is going through at the moment.

Idnew
May 7th, 2004, 08:24 AM
Latest polls have them neck and neck

This should be an interesting election

The puppy is beginning to look better and better:)

What we need is a woman to run and straighten it all out as long as it's not someone like Hillery

dave404
May 7th, 2004, 09:12 AM
Well you can have Baroness Thatcher. Her mind has gone the same way as Ronnie's, alas, but it's quite hard to tell the difference, as she was always a bit bonkers anyway. And she certainly isn't anything like Hillary Clinton.

dave404
May 7th, 2004, 09:27 AM
A few additions to Dippy's helpful comments:

Lord Archer also enjoys the unusual distinction of having a wife described as "fragrant" by a High Court judge, which is something very few people can boast of. He can boast an extensive back catalogue of lies: most of the people who know him well say he's been telling whoppers almost as soon as he could talk. He also writes books that sell very well in airports, but which no-one will ever admit to reading, though you'd think someone as loosely acquainted with the truth as Jeffrey would make quite a good fiction writer.

Noel Edmunds, on the other hand, is wanted by the UN for crimes against humanity, including Mr Blobby, TV Addicts, and Crinkly Bottom, and by the fashion police for the accumulation of a massive arsenal of Sweaters of Mass Distraction, which he has used to terrorize the British public for many years. Grown men have been known to hide behind the sofa. He is to light entertainment roughly what Genghis Khan was to domestic cleaning.

Idnew
May 8th, 2004, 09:59 AM
:lol Good some humor around here for a change of pace

PlayCrackTheSky
May 10th, 2004, 06:21 PM
Anyone else think Kerry kind of looks like a horse?

Im voteing for bush because, well how many more words can one man possably make up? I say we find out! But no seriously i like Bush although some of his plans are a little...debateable...i just like him.

On the other hand all Kerry is giveing me is that hes good at getting shot...not a quality you want in the leader of a country.

DEAD ZONE
May 10th, 2004, 07:34 PM
Originally posted by Duo Maxwell
Anyone else think Kerry kind of looks like a horse?

Im voteing for bush because, well how many more words can one man possably make up? I say we find out! But no seriously i like Bush although some of his plans are a little...debateable...i just like him.

On the other hand all Kerry is giveing me is that hes good at getting shot...not a quality you want in the leader of a country. http://home.golden.net/~trinity/Images/lurch-kerry.jpg

kontulib
May 12th, 2004, 06:42 AM
Why I´m not one of those options? :mad

aclu14
May 12th, 2004, 08:19 AM
Originally posted by Duo Maxwell
Anyone else think Kerry kind of looks like a horse?



Anyone else think Bush kind of looks like a chimp?

http://www.boomersfunnies.com/Pictures/Bush%20Monkey.jpg

AWPrime
May 12th, 2004, 08:37 AM
Originally posted by kontulib
Why I´m not one of those options? :mad

You're not insane.

kontulib
May 12th, 2004, 09:05 AM
Originally posted by AWPrime


You're not insane.

You haven´t seen my prescriptions.

PlayCrackTheSky
May 12th, 2004, 01:08 PM
Touche aclu

DEAD ZONE
May 12th, 2004, 04:31 PM
The senate voted yesterday on extending unemployment benefits for 13 weeks. 12 repubs and 46 dems voted yes. the vote was 59-40 .failed.Only 1 vote needed and guess who was to busy to cast his vote?

Mr. Kerry.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=536&ncid=536&e=11&u=/ap/20040511/ap_on_go_co/unemployment_benefits

He dose say he supports it and the AP reports , "John Kerry has fought again and again to extend unemployment benefits for workers left behind in the Bush economy."
To bad he could not bring himself to care enough to get it past.He does have an absent record thats pathetic.

Dole quit the senate for his run and Kerry should do the same. If he had any confidence and respect for his constituence he would.

King Solomon
May 12th, 2004, 05:01 PM
Originally posted by DEAD ZONE
...Dole quit the senate for his run and Kerry should do the same. If he had any confidence and respect for his constituence he would.


Let's go one better: Bush, Cheney and Kerry ALL quit their jobs to run for the Presidency. Anything that would make one person quit and one keep his office would be hypocritical :smash

DEAD ZONE
May 12th, 2004, 07:24 PM
Originally posted by King Solomon



Let's go one better: Bush, Cheney and Kerry ALL quit their jobs to run for the Presidency. Anything that would make one person quit and one keep his office would be hypocritical :smash http://boortz.com/images/funny/bland_aid.jpg

PlayCrackTheSky
May 12th, 2004, 07:40 PM
Well you know maybe kerry should quit, maybe he shouldnt, apparently unemployment isnt that important. Stupid people without jobs.....

DEAD ZONE
May 12th, 2004, 07:50 PM
Originally posted by aclu14


Anyone else think Bush kind of looks like a chimp?

Yes. LOL. These are classics.

DEAD ZONE
May 12th, 2004, 08:44 PM
Originally posted by Duo Maxwell
Well you know maybe kerry should quit, maybe he shouldnt, apparently unemployment isnt that important. Stupid people without jobs..... considering that rate has been dropping steadily, It should not be harped on as some kind of trump card.a net of 288 thousand plus jobs were created last month. Besides, its not the governments job to employ you or make jobs. They are to stay out of the way. Dont blame Bush because some dont have marketable skills and made bad choices.

PlayCrackTheSky
May 12th, 2004, 08:51 PM
Im fully aware of that fact. I dont like unemployment policys like welfare and junk. Im also aware the president cannot be blamed for the economy. HE dosent control that stuff although policys can affect trends in the stock market but you really cant blame one man for the entire econnomy..

DEAD ZONE
May 12th, 2004, 09:23 PM
Its the darn congres for the most part. Both are repubs property at present and they have screwed the pooch with their spend thrift ways.Bush has not vetoed a darn thing hardly. That we can blame THEM for.

dave404
May 14th, 2004, 06:18 AM
I don't take a lot of interest in this question, but the other day I came across a link (which I've lost, sorry) to a site called JohnKerryIsADoucheBagButI'mGoingToVoteForHimAnyway . Made me laugh.

Sjax
May 14th, 2004, 07:12 AM
Was it this one (http://www.johnkerryisadouchebagbutimvotingforhimanyway.c om/) Dave?

DEAD ZONE
May 14th, 2004, 10:06 AM
since his vietnam bit is all he seems to have to offer;
Sen. John Kerry was told to leave Vietnam by three colleagues upset with his behavior and attitudes, according to a fellow swift-boat officer during the war.

Thomas Wright says the misbehavior of the presumptive Democratic presidential candidate got to the point where he no longer wanted him in his boat group. So, at Wright's request, his divisional commander assigned Kerry to another group. Then Wright and like-minded boat officers took matters into their own hands, according to John B. Dwyer, a Vietnam veteran and military historian writing in the online magazine American Thinker.

"When he got his third Purple Heart, three of us told him to leave," Wright said, according to Dwyer. "We knew how the system worked and we didn't want him in Coastal Division 11.

"Kerry didn't manipulate the system," he continued, "we did."
http://www.americanthinker.com/index.php

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38483

Well well I am sure Kerry did notshed any tears in leaving .We do have to lay off some however since his own mates helped run him out.

[i]The officer said he and most other swift-boat officers had two commandments: 1. Protect the crews. 2. Win.

But working with "Boston Strangler" became problematical, he said, according to Dwyer.

"I had a lot of trouble getting him to follow orders," Wright recalled. "He had a different view of leadership and operations. Those of us with direct experience working with Kerry found him difficult and oriented toward his personal, rather than unit goals and objectives."

Wright said he "believed that overall responsibility rested squarely on the shoulders of the OIC or OTC [Officer-in-Tactical Command] in a free-fire zone. You had to be right [before opening fire]."

However, he continued, "Kerry seemed to believe there were no rules in a free-fire zone, and you were supposed to kill anyone. I didn't see it that way."

dave404
May 14th, 2004, 11:18 AM
Ahem. Thanks Sjax, I do believe that might be it!

:o

DEAD ZONE
May 14th, 2004, 08:46 PM
"There's nothing exciting about him," one of the students, Amber Kelsie, tells the paper. "He's almost as tree-stumpy as Gore is. He feels like he wavers on issues or he won't take an actual stance."
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/president/articles/2004/05/14/pragmatism_drives_nh_naderites_to_kerry?pg=full
Even his own have a hard time with him. they also agree wit me that he really has yet to satnd for or offer anything .

Ateo
May 15th, 2004, 01:04 AM
Originally posted by DEAD ZONE
"There's nothing exciting about him," one of the students, Amber Kelsie, tells the paper. "He's almost as tree-stumpy as Gore is. He feels like he wavers on issues or he won't take an actual stance."
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/president/articles/2004/05/14/pragmatism_drives_nh_naderites_to_kerry?pg=full
Even his own have a hard time with him. they also agree wit me that he really has yet to satnd for or offer anything . I agree about 85%.

The only thing he's got going for him is that he's a viable (if not exciting) alternative to Bush, and that's fine with me (and a lot of voters at this point)

ILENSER
May 15th, 2004, 09:11 AM
None of the above.

sorry but I dont care for the choices we been given the past 50 years.

DEAD ZONE
May 15th, 2004, 08:26 PM
Originally posted by tigsnort
I agree about 85%.

The only thing he's got going for him is that he's a viable (if not exciting) alternative to Bush, and that's fine with me (and a lot of voters at this point) Tig, you just proved you are in lala land. The articles point {visa-ve the supporters} was that he is NOT exciting at all.

In their cloth sandals, worn jeans, and "Support Fair Trade" sweatshirts, 15 members of the Dartmouth Greens gathered here Monday night for their weekly discussion of social justice and politics. The conversation veered from the economic abuse of sweatshop laborers to the physical abuse of Iraqi prisoners and whether a protest action of papering the campus with photos of abused Iraqis--with the caption, "Is this the occupation you wanted?"--would exploit the victims further.

While none of the 15 particularly like Kerry--"wavering," "craggy," "passable," and "tree-stumpy" were among their descriptions of him--this intensely antiwar group has almost unanimously decided to forsake Nader, a man they see as an idol, to help Kerry win New Hampshire, a key battleground state.
HELLO!!

dave404
May 17th, 2004, 10:14 AM
DZ, you and Tig are saying the same thing, it's just a misunderstanding. I think he should really have said: "...viable, if unexciting..." but I still understood what he meant. Nobody thinks JK is exciting.

Ateo
May 17th, 2004, 01:48 PM
Originally posted by dave404
DZ, you and Tig are saying the same thing, it's just a misunderstanding. I think he should really have said: "...viable, if unexciting..." but I still understood what he meant. Nobody thinks JK is exciting. Right--I meant he's unexciting. Didn't I say that? :)

Some are saying--and I might be inclined to agree--that kerry is purposefully laying low and staying mellow right now so he can have more impact right before the election. If he was all sturm & drang now, it would lose it's effectiveness by November. Also, he may be wise enough to realize that he doesn't need to tear Bush down, as Bush is doing a fine job of that himself.

But he will need to kick it up a few notches at some point.

Serendipity
May 18th, 2004, 04:40 PM
Originally posted by tigsnort
Right--I meant he's unexciting. Didn't I say that? :)I would say your post was ambiguous. Of course, I read it as you meant it :cool :lol, but I can see why DZ interpreted it the other way - that's if he's not viable then he's exciting. Dave's right: unexciting would have been better. Don't you hate pedantic mods? :lol

I'm glad I'm not voting in this election - looks like a choice between the devil and the deep blue sea.

aclu14
May 21st, 2004, 11:18 PM
Originally posted by Sjax
Was it this one (http://www.johnkerryisadouchebagbutimvotingforhimanyway.c om/) Dave?

:lol :clap

jstnomega
May 23rd, 2004, 08:12 PM
Originally posted by DEAD ZONE


"There's nothing exciting about him," one of the students, Amber Kelsie, tells the paper.

Not exactly spot on http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2004223099,00.html

~wildangel~
May 24th, 2004, 11:46 AM
My choice is not on there, i say neither! In hopes they both die in a flaming car crash:wink

aclu14
May 24th, 2004, 09:31 PM
Originally posted by ~wildangel~
My choice is not on there, i say neither! In hopes they both die in a flaming car crash:wink

One can only hope. [endjohnnydeppasjacksparrowvoice]

Idnew
May 25th, 2004, 08:14 AM
My choice is not on there, i say neither! In hopes they both die in a flaming car crash Now that's a little harsh don't you think? It will be an interesting election as they are both still pretty much even in the polls.

AWPrime
May 25th, 2004, 10:56 AM
Originally posted by ~wildangel~
My choice is not on there, i say neither! In hopes they both die in a flaming car crash:wink

Our found in bed together.

~wildangel~
May 25th, 2004, 04:15 PM
Our found in bed together

:lol

Id i'm only teasing...sorta:wink

AWPrime
May 26th, 2004, 01:57 PM
http://www.politicalstrikes.com/images/ps0997.jpg

http://www.politicalstrikes.com/images/ps1003.jpg

~wildangel~
June 9th, 2004, 11:05 AM
Kerry looks so dorky, he reminds me of Larry from Threes Company!:lol

King Solomon
June 9th, 2004, 12:57 PM
Yea, but Bush looks like a little monkey and you hate little monkeys. remember?

~wildangel~
June 9th, 2004, 01:08 PM
I hate creepy little monkeys too!

:lol

PlayCrackTheSky
June 22nd, 2004, 03:26 PM
Someone that old shouldnt be snow boarding...

Phreakmeister
July 3rd, 2004, 07:09 PM
According to several news media, Kerry is about to reveal his running mate. This will probably occur this Tuesday. Slate (http://slate.msn.com/id/2101383/) has mentioned a few candidates. Who do you think it will be? My bets are on Edwards.

Amurka - Make no Mistake (http://www.amurka.com/en/gall_clips.htm)

sinecure
July 4th, 2004, 08:55 PM
He's already rejected one potential running mate as being a little too fond of publicity, notoriety and controversy...

~wildangel~
July 6th, 2004, 01:21 PM
LOL at the both of you...:lol

OMG Sin, that boob looks saggy and gross!

:toast

aclu14
July 6th, 2004, 11:27 PM
Originally posted by Phreakmeister
According to several news media, Kerry is about to reveal his running mate. This will probably occur this Tuesday. Slate (http://slate.msn.com/id/2101383/) has mentioned a few candidates. Who do you think it will be? My bets are on Edwards.

Amurka - Make no Mistake (http://www.amurka.com/en/gall_clips.htm)

Correctomundo!

MacReady
July 10th, 2004, 10:16 PM
I am voting for Kerry period. I wouldnt vote for Nader cuz he is helping Bush by taking away votes.

w1che
August 12th, 2004, 11:33 PM
Isn't it funny that those cartoons that AW posted go so well with his tag line....:lol

AW'S tag line.... How more insults people use, the dumber they are.

jstnomega
August 14th, 2004, 08:24 PM
none of the above

this is the worst choice we've had since '76

didn't vote then, either

RosieWolf
August 15th, 2004, 01:12 AM
if u don't exercise ur right to vote.. then u have no right to exercise ur opinion.. so there.. laffin

and that goes double for underage little girls who think they KNOW everything!!!!.. when ur old enuff to vote little one, come back and we'll have normal discussions like between tig and wunchie.. mwaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahhaha

DustyBottoms
August 15th, 2004, 02:03 AM
Originally posted by jstnomega
none of the above

this is the worst choice we've had since '76

didn't vote then, either

I've never failed to vote... Never will. :smash

I figure it like this. If only have the citizens vote, then my vote carries twice the weight. :wink

~wildangel~
August 15th, 2004, 02:03 PM
I am voting for Kerry period.

I'm sorry, is there anything i can do?:lol :lol

ProudAtheist13
August 15th, 2004, 02:13 PM
Originally posted by RosieWolf
if u don't exercise ur right to vote.. then u have no right to exercise ur opinion.. I used to feel that way. I'm voting for Nader this time because I can't bring myself to vote for a bible toting, gun slinging christian or a liberal suffering from serious "Robin Hood Syndrome"

~wildangel~
August 15th, 2004, 02:17 PM
Well, at least your not voting for Kerry:clap

Idnew
August 16th, 2004, 05:04 PM
:lol Yep your right Wild :lol